prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Komparativna analiza ozljeda na radu Republike Hrvatske i Kanade
Access restricted to students and staff of home institution
undergraduate thesis
Komparativna analiza ozljeda na radu Republike Hrvatske i Kanade
2017. urn:nbn:hr:128:476924
Ožegović, Jakov
Karlovac University of Applied Sciences
The Department of Safety and Protection

Cite this document

Ožegović, J. (2017). Komparativna analiza ozljeda na radu Republike Hrvatske i Kanade (Undergraduate thesis). Karlovac: Karlovac University of Applied Sciences. Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:128:476924

Ožegović, Jakov. "Komparativna analiza ozljeda na radu Republike Hrvatske i Kanade." Undergraduate thesis, Karlovac University of Applied Sciences, 2017. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:128:476924

Ožegović, Jakov. "Komparativna analiza ozljeda na radu Republike Hrvatske i Kanade." Undergraduate thesis, Karlovac University of Applied Sciences, 2017. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:128:476924

Ožegović, J. (2017). 'Komparativna analiza ozljeda na radu Republike Hrvatske i Kanade', Undergraduate thesis, Karlovac University of Applied Sciences, accessed 27 November 2024, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:128:476924

Ožegović J. Komparativna analiza ozljeda na radu Republike Hrvatske i Kanade [Undergraduate thesis]. Karlovac: Karlovac University of Applied Sciences; 2017 [cited 2024 November 27] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:128:476924

J. Ožegović, "Komparativna analiza ozljeda na radu Republike Hrvatske i Kanade", Undergraduate thesis, Karlovac University of Applied Sciences, Karlovac, 2017. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:128:476924

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.
Metadata
TitleKomparativna analiza ozljeda na radu Republike Hrvatske i Kanade
AuthorJakov Ožegović
MentorIvan Štedul (mentor)
Committee memberMarijan Brozović (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee memberMarko Ožura (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberJasna Sabljarić (član povjerenstva)
Committee memberIvan Štedul (član povjerenstva)
GranterKarlovac University of Applied Sciences
(The Department of Safety and Protection)
Karlovac
Defense date and country2017-09-27, Croatia
Scientific / art field,
discipline and subdiscipline		TECHNICAL SCIENCES
Basic Technical Sciences
Abstract
Jedna od ključnih faza radnog procesa je zaštita na radu. Glavni cilj razvijenog sustava zaštite na radu je sprječavanje nastanka ozljeda na radu i stvaranje mjera sigurnosti za smanjenje rizika od nastanka istih. Smanjenje ozljeda uzrokovanih radom smanjit će se samo ukoliko postoji pravi pristup kao i pravilno sigurno ponašanje i razmišljanje. Svaka tvrtka vodi zapis o broju ozljeda na radu i na temelju toga izrađuje statističko izvješće. Takav način statističkog prikupljanja podataka i njihove analize tvrtke koriste kako bi spriječile ozljede na radu i smanjile njihovu učestalost. Kako bismo znali na kojem stupnju razvoja je naš sustav zaštite na radu potrebno je provesti usporedbu sa drugim državama, i to onima koje su među razvijenijima u svijetu. Upravo se u ovom radu i provodi jedna takva usporedba i to sa Kanadom. Uspoređujući metodologije obiju država mogu se izvući određeni zaključci. U ovom radu opisane dvije metodologije, ESAW i NWISP kao i sve moguće razlike, sličnosti, prednosti i nedostaci u provođenju zaštite na radu.
Abstract (english)
One of the key stages of the work process is safety at work. The main goal of the developed safety at work system is to prevent the onset of work injury and to create safety measures to reduce the risk of their occurrence. Reducing work-related injuries will only be reduced if there is proper approach as well as safe conduct and thinking. Each company keeps a record of the number of injuries at work and accordingly draws up a statistical report. Such a method of statistical data collection and their company analysis are used to prevent labor injuries and reduce their incidence. In order to know at what degree of development is our safety at work system, it needs to be compared to other countries, those who are among the most developed in the world. It is in this paper that one such comparison is made, and that’s with Canada. By comparing the methodology of both countries, certain conclusions can be drawn. This paper describes two methodologies, ESAW and NWISP, as well as all possible differences, similarities, advantages and disadvantages in the implementation of occupational safety.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Languagecroatian
URN:NBNurn:nbn:hr:128:476924
Study programmeTitle: Security and Protection Studies
Study programme type: professional
Study level: undergraduate
Academic / professional title: stručni/a prvostupnik/prvostupnica (baccalaureus/baccalaurea) inženjer/inženjerka sigurnosti i zaštite (stručni/a prvostupnik/prvostupnica (baccalaureus/baccalaurea) inženjer/inženjerka sigurnosti i zaštite)
Type of resourceText
File originBorn digital
Access conditionsAccess restricted to students and staff of home institution
Terms of useLicence In copyright icon
Created on2018-02-16 13:59:33